Scroll to Main content, Navigation

Note: Read why this site appears to be in plain text.
Navigation:
Sprint Global Sites:
Sprint Global Navigation:
Section links:
Waste Reduction
Sprint strives to be a responsible steward of the resources it consumes. The company seeks to optimize the amount of resources used for operations, which is the first step toward reducing the amount of waste generated. Sprint then emphasizes the reuse and recycling of that waste whenever feasible to reduce the company's overall impact on landfills.
Landfill
Sprint's goal is to reduce the amount of operational waste it sends to landfills by 30 percent by 2017. Originally, the target reduction was to be based on the amount of waste generated by Sprint in 2007. As Sprint has come to better understand its waste — generated by nearly 2,300 manned sites across the U.S. — and the limitations of its reporting capabilities, this approach is undergoing a transition.
In the past, Sprint estimated its operational-waste footprint based on reporting available from waste-removal invoices for a portion of its sites. That data was used to create an average landfill-to-waste figure per square foot of property for each facility type. Those averages were then applied to the total square footage for their respective facility type to develop a comprehensive estimate for all Sprint sites.
The challenge with this approach is that Sprint had little to no visibility into the actual waste practices in non-reporting sites (e.g., how much landfill waste was produced, whether recycling was in place, etc.). By default, the estimates assumed no recycling was being conducted. This likely overestimated waste-to-landfill figures as non-reporting sites comprise the majority of Sprint facilities. To address this issue of limited visibility, Sprint has decided to sharpen the focus of its reporting.
Sprint's public reporting of landfill waste will now focus on sites where it maintains Operational Control (OC) of waste removal services. In these OC sites, Sprint controls which vendor provides waste removal and receives a direct bill for that service. The OC sites represent 84 percent of the square feet in Sprint's entire facility portfolio (sites that receive any type of utility bill &mdash: electricity, waste, water, etc.).
While some vendors report how much waste is removed in their billing, not all do. As shown in the following table, Sprint has worked with its vendors in recent years to increase visibility to that reporting. The largest increases have come since the end of 2010, when Sprint began consolidating waste-removal services for its OC sites into national contracts &mdash: for details, click "National Roll-out" in the Learn More box. By the end of 2011, Sprint received reporting for sites that represent 75 percent of the square feet in its OC portfolio (which equals 63 percent of its entire facility portfolio). That's a 30 percent increase in site reporting since 2008.
Percent of OC Sites Reporting Landfill and/or Recycling
As % of Total SqFt per Year |
| Type of Facility |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
| Commercial Sites |
78% |
81% |
89% |
94% |
| Technical Sites |
4% |
12% |
24% |
39% |
| Retail Sites |
0% |
0% |
81% |
82% |
| All Sites |
45% |
50% |
66% |
75% |
Rather than extrapolating this data to estimate the unknown waste generated by non-reporting sites, Sprint's operational-waste footprint now reflects only the reported data provided by its waste-removal vendors. The following table provides that breakdown. For example, the total waste generated in 2011 by those Sprint OC sites that provided reporting was 5,871 metric tons. Of that amount, 1,569 metric tons was diverted from landfills via recycling — resulting in a landfill diversion rate of 27 percent.
While calculated differently than Sprint's original goal to reduce the level of landfill waste 30 percent from its baseline level in 2007, this measure does offer a consistent means of tracking landfill diversion for now. Sprint's intent is to eventually resume the original measure. However, Sprint will likely reset the baseline year for the original goal due to the lack of detailed data and the low percent of sites reporting associate with 2007. Sprint will be much closer to 100% reporting for its OC sites by the end of 2012. With that in mind, it is probable that 2012 will serve as the new baseline.
Amount of Waste for All OC Sites Reporting Landfill and/or Recycling
Metric Tons per Year |
| Type of Operational Waste |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
| Landfill |
2,010 |
2,467 |
3,452 |
4,302 |
| Recycling |
700 |
1,120 |
1,027 |
1,569 |
| Total |
2,710 |
3,587 |
4,478 |
5,871 |
| Landfill Diversion Rate |
26% |
31% |
23% |
27% |
In summary, Sprint has made tremendous strides in understanding its operational-waste data and establishing a repeatable, auditable process to measure and report on landfill-diversion performance.
Sprint will continue to refine this measure as reporting accuracy matures within waste removal industry. Many opportunities exist for improvement. For instance, the vast majority of trucks used to haul waste and recycling in the U.S. have no on-board scales to weigh how is much actually removed from a site. With no system in place to weigh the load, waste removers tend to measure based on the volume of the container and assume it is full. In addition, there is no set of standard conversion rates used industry-wide to determine how much a cubic yard of waste weighs in pounds by type. Moving forward, Sprint will seek opportunities to encourage its vendors and the waste industry to address these issues.
Recycling
Sprint recognizes the benefits of recycling. Diverting reusable materials from the waste stream helps to conserve landfill space, preserve the environment and reduce the energy and resources required to extract virgin materials. It also provides bottom-line benefits like reduced waste-hauling and landfill-tipping fees. In some cases, it even yields financial rebates for recyclable material captured. Inspired by these benefits, Sprint has increased waste recycling, as reported by its OC and non-OC sites, from 683 metric tons in 2007 to 2,293 metric tons in 2011 — more than three-fold.

For recycling, Sprint is comfortable including the amount of material reported even from non-OC sites (i.e., facilities where Sprint has no operation control over the general vendor for waste removal). This is because many materials are collected and reported by specialty vendors that Sprint hires. Examples include a national vendor for fluorescent-bulb recycling who services all Sprint sites and another vendor who collects, shreds and recycles documents for Sprint retail stores. Following is a list of all the materials in Sprint's operational waste stream collected for recycling by facility type.
Amount of Material Recycled for All OC and Non-OC Sites Reporting
Reporting for 2011 (Metric Tons) |
| Material Type |
Commercial Sites |
Technical Sites |
Retail Sites |
Total |
| Office Paper |
91.8 |
8.6 |
40.6 |
140.9 |
| Cardboard |
77.3 |
3.7 |
0.0 |
81.1 |
| Scrap Pallets |
2.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.3 |
| Compost |
32.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
32.9 |
| Batteries |
3.7 |
0.6 |
3.7 |
8.0 |
| Plastic-Aluminum |
22.1 |
5.1 |
0.0 |
27.2 |
| Toner Cartridges |
2.4 |
0.2 |
0.0 |
2.7 |
| Metals |
2.8 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.8 |
| Lamps |
2.5 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.5 |
| Glass |
103.0 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
104.3 |
| Oil |
2.9 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
2.9 |
| Rubber |
0.4 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
| Shredded Paper |
567.0 |
161.1 |
408.8 |
1136.9 |
| Furniture |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
| Single Stream |
372.0 |
152.3 |
223.4 |
747.7 |
| Total Recycled |
1283.3 |
332.9 |
676.5 |
2292.7 |
Composting
As shown in the table above, Sprint recycles some valuable materials through composting. For example, food waste from the cafeterias and coffee shops at Sprint's headquarters campus in Overland Park, Kan., is composted. Special bins and biodegradable liners are used by staff to collect the food waste. The diverted landfill waste in these containers is picked up three times per week and taken to a local composting farm run by Missouri Organic. This all takes place behind the scenes, so the only difference Sprint employees experience is the satisfaction of knowing cafeteria-food waste is being repurposed. Discard is collected from prep areas, dirty plates and perishable unsold items. Paper napkins go in the food-waste collection along with paper cups. Even organic-landscape waste from the campus is captured for composting. Sprint then closes the loop by purchasing the resulting compost from Missouri Organics for use in campus landscaping.
National Roll-out
While trash is a normal consequence of doing business, it is possible to manage it in an environmentally responsible and affordable manner. Sprint is constantly striving to efficiently and sustainably handle its operational waste to help maintain a healthy planet and a healthy bottom line.
Sprint conducts business in hundreds of locations across the country — retail stores, commercial office buildings, call centers, data centers and network sites (e.g., cell towers, switch sites, etc.). For a subset of these locations, Sprint controls the selection of the waste remover and pays the trash-utility invoice directly. These locations are referred to as being under Sprint's "operational control." Historically, each of these sites contracted with a waste remover on its own.
In late 2010, Sprint signed a national agreement with a leading provider of waste-removal services. That waste hauler now provides services to approximately 230 of Sprint's retail, commercial and network facilities — roughly a third of the sites where Sprint has operational control. Through a combination of preferred national pricing, the "right-sizing" of trash-bin size and optimizing the frequency of pick-up service, Sprint was able generate significant cost savings for the business.
These savings enabled Sprint to achieve a new milestone in its efforts to reduce landfill waste — the first step toward a national roll-out of recycling. Sprint was able to implement recycling services at most of the 230 locations, many of which have the opportunity to recycle for the first time. This conversion was popular with employees, including many who had been requesting recycling services for years. And, even after the expense of rolling out the new recycling services, Sprint still pockets a savings of approximately $158,000 per year, given some fluctuation annually.
In early 2012, Sprint signed a national contract with a second, well-respected supplier of waste-removal services. This move and its cost savings will likely enable Sprint to bring recycling services to hundreds of additional sites. Once fully implemented, along with further consolidation efforts, these two national contracts will cover nearly all locations where Sprint has operational control of its waste stream.
Waste Audits
Sprint has recently rolled out recycling to hundreds of its sites across the country for the first time. As with any new service, there is a need to ensure that Sprint associates understand and are following the new process. Anticipating this, Sprint built an essential element into the national contracts with its two primary waste-removal providers; each vendor will conduct periodic waste audits to evaluate how effectively recycling is being implemented in various Sprint locations.
The first audit was conducted in the spring of 2012. Twelve Sprint sites, including retail, commercial and network locations across the country stretching from Las Vegas to Vienna, Va., were evaluated during one-day visits. Overall, the audits found that Sprint associates are making good progress to incorporate recycling as part of the daily business routine.
There were opportunities for improvement, though. Some locations, for example, need better signage on internal and external waste and recycle bins. Others could do a better job of separating of cardboard for recycling and would benefit from receiving tools to help them break down old boxes (previous studies show that cardboard makes up more than half the waste stream in Sprint retail stores). Analysis of the results will help Sprint improve communication with employees and janitorial staff to further improve recycling behavior.
Another important finding of the waste audit was the near absence of electronic waste (e-waste) in the trash dumpsters at sites that were inspected. In its Electronics Stewardship Policy, Sprint announced the goal to collect 100 percent of the e-waste generated by its facilities annually for reuse and recycling by 2017. Sprint will rely on these waste audits as one tool to help determine its success in managing exit points for e-waste (like keyboards, power cords, computing equipment, routers, etc.) and ensuring that it flows only to third-party certified vendors for reuse and recycling.
Zero Waste
In 2011, Sprint's Real Estate team decided to pursue an innovative approach to
waste management by asking a very simple question: "Is it possible to reduce,
reuse or recycle 100 percent of our operational waste stream and convert
Sprint headquarters campus to a zero-waste environment?"
"Zero waste" means that all operational waste (e.g., cardboard, office paper,
aluminum cans, plastic cutlery, etc.) would be collected for recycling,
composting or use as an alternative source of fuel. For Sprint, it was
adding "waste-to-energy," as a final step in the company's reduce/reuse/
recycle strategy that completed the picture. In early 2011, Sprint contracted with a Systech waste-to-energy
facility 25 miles northeast of Sprint's headquarters campus in Overland Park, Kan., to handle the
remnants in its operational waste stream. The facility provides power for Lafarge by heating its cement
production kiln more cleanly than the coke and coal upon which it has solely relied in the past.
Since the waste-to-energy process requires highly combustible items, Sprint needed to determine if
its remaining waste stream was a good fuel source. An initial trial was arranged that included six test
shipments. It was found that Sprint's waste contained levels of metals, food and liquids that exceeded
tolerance levels required for the processing facility. In response, Sprint has implemented the following
solutions to refine its headquarters' waste stream and help achieve its vision for zero waste.
Campus Cafeteria Efforts
The waste-to-energy trial revealed an unexpected opportunity for cleaning the waste stream at Sprint
headquarters when it identified how wet the trash could be. Sprint's food-service provider participates
in the composting program by collecting coffee grounds and other food waste for pick up. However, an
audit found this was being negatively offset by 800-900 pounds of ice from salad bars being tossed in
the trash compactor each day.
Thanks to this discovery, ice is now used in limited fashion. This eliminates approximately 450
pounds of ice a day. The vendor now washes any remaining ice down the drains to keep the compactor
contents as dry as possible. The result is a cleaner waste stream, water savings and reduced costs.
Break-room Recycle Center
Two other concerns uncovered in the waste-to-energy
trial were recyclable metals and compostable materials,
both of which had larger-than-expected amounts ending
up in the trash. A new recycling-center prototype was
installed in an employee break room as a test to improve
how employees disposed of waste. They were given clear
direction on how to use the compost, recycle and landfill
waste bins in the new center. Within two weeks of
installing it, employees had diverted so much recyclable
and compostable material that the volume of landfill
trash collected for waste-to-energy had decreased by
70%.
Based on this success, Sprint is expanding the effort and will roll out similar recycle centers to an entire
campus building with a dedicated trash compactor. This will enable Sprint to send landfill waste from
at least one location to the Systec waste-to-energy facility by the end of 2012. Sprint will continue to
roll out the new recycling centers for the rest of the campus at a financially feasible pace in 2013 and
beyond.
Hazardous Waste
In accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations, Sprint meets the requirements as a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG ). To qualify for this rating, businesses must generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or 1 kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste.
Sprint operations do not generate hazardous waste, and Sprint responsibly disposes of solid wastes per EPA regulations when discovered in facilities (switches and administrative sites). Such materials typically include excess paints, aerosol cans, cleaning supplies, etc., which are left on site by contractor or on-site maintenance operations. Before the materials are classified as a hazardous waste, Sprint evaluates the condition to determine if they are usable product or a solid waste as defined under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Once determined the material is a solid waste, it is then classified as a hazardous waste if it meets the criteria as defined by the regulations.
Sprint has an agreement with a national emergency-response contractor to respond to spill incidents and non-routine solid-waste disposal services. All Hazardous and Non-Hazardous/Non-RCRA Regulated waste materials are disposed in the United States in accordance with Federal (EPA) and state regulations.
All pertinent Sprint associates have access to Sprint’s Emergency Response procedures with training specifically given to site managers. The Sprint Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) team works with site personnel to safely manage all hazardous-waste materials.
2011 Performance & Overarching Goal
The hazardous waste (governed under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and regulated under the Code of Federal Regulations 40 CFR Parts 260-262) disposed by Sprint is primarily paint- related material. Sprint safely and responsibly disposed of 1,390 lbs. (630 kg.) of paint-related hazardous waste and 1 gallon (20 lbs. or 9 kg.) of muriatic acid in 2011, which were discovered at six different Sprint facilities.
Sprint's goal is to dispose of zero hazardous waste. However, the company recognizes this will be a challenge given that most hazardous-waste occurrences are the result of vendor/maintenance personnel leaving inappropriate materials at sites. Sprint’s objective in these instances is to work with the vendor to retrieve the materials they have left behind and ensure they do not repeat this mistake in the future.
Sprint will continue working proactively to prevent these scenarios by honing its vendor policies and communications. Even so, it is likely that the number instances will increase during the next few years. With the implementation of Network Vision, the level of vendor activity at Sprint facilities will be at record levels, increasing the odds of materials being left on site.
Helping Employees
Recycling is on the rise at Sprint. Employees now
have more options than ever for recycling materials
at work. Sprint also makes it easy and convenient for
thousands of employees to recycle household waste
in addition to work-related waste. At its
headquarters campus in Overland Park, Kan., Sprint
offers the following solutions.
Paper Shredding
There's always a lot of talk about "going paperless" —
and Sprint customers who receive and pay their
invoice electronically are already well on their way
there! But in spite of this, most people still generate a paper trail. It includes many documents that are
highly sensitive. Tax returns, bank statements and investment information are just a few examples of
paper that needs to remain private.
To assist with the secure and environmentally responsible disposal of personal documents, Sprint
encourages its campus employees to bring personal documents from home on the last Friday of each
month for shredding and recycling service. Trained, licensed personnel assist employees with this free
service. The items collected are shred with a giant commercial shredder and recycled.
Glass
In 2009, Kansas City metro-area residents threw away 68,000 metric tons of glass. Without a nearby
facility to process used glass, there was almost no local recycling offered. One area business, Boulevard
Brewing Company, was tired of being part of the problem with 10 million of their bottles being buried in
local landfills each year. With the support of companies like Sprint that agreed to provide local collection
points, Boulevard came up with a solution and created the not-for-profit entity Ripple Glass.
Ripple Glass built a state-of-the-art processing plant, placed collection bins throughout the community,
and found a local company that agreed to convert the recycled glass into fiberglass insulation. Sprint
agreed to host a collection bin at its headquarters campus and encourages employees to bring empty
household jars and bottles to work for convenient glass recycling. As of December 2011, the Ripple Glass
bin at Sprint has prevented more than 160 metric tons of glass from being buried in local landfills.
Plastics and Aluminum
Recycling has become such a common practice that many people assume that it is available everywhere;
but Sprint understands that some local communities are unable to offer residents curbside recycling for
a variety of reasons. To assist employees who are faced with this inconvenience, Sprint provides a large,
external mixed-recycling bin on the lot of an easily accessible building on campus. Employees may bring
most recyclable plastics and aluminum cans from home and deposit them in the container at no cost.
Clothing
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. generates nearly 12 million metric tons
of textile waste each year. Much of this waste comes in the form of gently used clothing. In January
2012, Sprint partnered with a local not-for-profit organization to provide collection bins for employees.
On their way into work, they can now drop off their gently used clothes and shoes in the bright yellow
Planet Aid bins located near other employee recycle containers (glass, plastics and aluminum).
The clothing and shoe items — more than 45,000 metric tons per year collected across the U.S. — are
processed by Planet Aid and sold to exporters who provide the items at low cost to people in need all
over the world. Sprint's campus averages 130 pounds (59 kilograms) of donated items each week.
By-Product Synergy
The Sprint Foundation, Sprint's philanthropic arm, has provided
Bridging the Gap with $35,000 in grants to fund the By-Product Synergy program in 2011 and 2012.
The initiative is based on the old adage that "one man's trash is
another man's treasure." Member companies in the Kansas City area
meet regularly to discuss what by-products (waste) each generates
and
how these materials be used as inputs (raw materials) for another company's production and
operations. The goal of the program is to help companies significantly reduce the amount of trash they
send to landfills by finding other uses for it — just as the area's largest food bank did in 2011 when it
acquired 144 cubic feet of thick-walled Styrofoam coolers and gel packs from a local recycling center to
repurpose for the collection and distribution of food to local residents in need.
By-Product Synergy makes it easier to create these types of connections. The program offers an online
marketplace to help participants to promote their available resources more efficiently. It is free for
potential buyers to inquire or bid on any item listed on the marketplace. Procurement officials can find
high-quality materials, bid instantly and quickly arrange to take possession, all with no risk.
An analysis by Ohio State University suggests that by achieving a waste-conversion rate of 100,000 tons,
the Kansas City BPS network members would save approximately $30 million in total operating costs.
It also estimates that the associated lifecycle environmental benefits include avoiding about 2.2 million
tons of greenhouse gases and about 100 million gallons of water consumption. These benefits are
mainly a result of eliminating the virgin-material purchases that are replaced by by-product synergies.
Click here to view additional program details and read case studies on successful synergies.